<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design flaw allows you avoid penalty points?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomfoley.net/2009/06/29/design-flaw-allows-you-avoid-penalty-points/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomfoley.net/2009/06/29/design-flaw-allows-you-avoid-penalty-points/</link>
	<description>Blogging from the heart of Ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penalty Points</title>
		<link>http://www.tomfoley.net/2009/06/29/design-flaw-allows-you-avoid-penalty-points/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Penalty Points</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomfoley.net/?p=468#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Really interesting post.. thanks. You make some very valid points and it is clear that most people agree with you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting post.. thanks. You make some very valid points and it is clear that most people agree with you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chocolatelover</title>
		<link>http://www.tomfoley.net/2009/06/29/design-flaw-allows-you-avoid-penalty-points/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>chocolatelover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomfoley.net/?p=468#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Nice one Tom, I am not sure if that is technically the correct procedure in place as they are obliged to give the refund back or not accept the cheque. but that email is going around again and its enough for people to pay the €80 but didnt see anywhere on any of the forums explaining that it could actually cost you more, so just wanted to warn people. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kind Regards,&lt;br&gt;Margaret</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one Tom, I am not sure if that is technically the correct procedure in place as they are obliged to give the refund back or not accept the cheque. but that email is going around again and its enough for people to pay the €80 but didnt see anywhere on any of the forums explaining that it could actually cost you more, so just wanted to warn people. </p>
<p>Kind Regards,<br />Margaret</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomfoley</title>
		<link>http://www.tomfoley.net/2009/06/29/design-flaw-allows-you-avoid-penalty-points/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>tomfoley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 03:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomfoley.net/?p=468#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Hello Chocolatelover! Here&#039;s an update for you that I know to be true. The ruse didn&#039;t work :( A pal got a notice and sent a cheque for €82 rather than the required €80. Some time later he received a confirmation that the points had been applied and a line in the letter referred to overpayments of less than $5 as not being refunded.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So in that particular case neither the cheque was returned, nor the €2 refunded. It&#039;s beginning to sound like a bit of an urban myth to me, great for a pub, but nowhere else ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Chocolatelover! Here&#39;s an update for you that I know to be true. The ruse didn&#39;t work <img src='http://www.tomfoley.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  A pal got a notice and sent a cheque for €82 rather than the required €80. Some time later he received a confirmation that the points had been applied and a line in the letter referred to overpayments of less than $5 as not being refunded.</p>
<p>So in that particular case neither the cheque was returned, nor the €2 refunded. It&#39;s beginning to sound like a bit of an urban myth to me, great for a pub, but nowhere else <img src='http://www.tomfoley.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chocolatelover</title>
		<link>http://www.tomfoley.net/2009/06/29/design-flaw-allows-you-avoid-penalty-points/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>chocolatelover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomfoley.net/?p=468#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Admin staff copped this pretty quick your cheque just gets returned and is not entered in the system until a cheque for the correct amount is received but people who want to chance this make sure you have enough time left to send in the correct amount otherwise if it goes over the 28 days guess what your fine is now €120 as opposed to €80. Just want to warn people who do try it its a pain paying €0 but even worse paying €120</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admin staff copped this pretty quick your cheque just gets returned and is not entered in the system until a cheque for the correct amount is received but people who want to chance this make sure you have enough time left to send in the correct amount otherwise if it goes over the 28 days guess what your fine is now €120 as opposed to €80. Just want to warn people who do try it its a pain paying €0 but even worse paying €120</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

